<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>discussion on @PaulRBerg</title><link>https://prberg-2019.netlify.app/tags/discussion/</link><description>Recent content in discussion on @PaulRBerg</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 01:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://prberg-2019.netlify.app/tags/discussion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Serendipity Visa: A Discourse On Talent Allocation</title><link>https://prberg-2019.netlify.app/post/2019/02/07/serendipity-visa/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 01:02:56 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://prberg-2019.netlify.app/post/2019/02/07/serendipity-visa/</guid><description>Preamble Some of my recent conversations touched on the subject of geographical leverage. It might be just a statistical outlier, but the topic intrigued me, so I cut off my commute podcasts to give the issue a little bit of thought. The result is what I call a Serendipity Visa: a peculiar way to imagine immigration, where the butterfly effect becomes an indispensable feature of society.
Although the discourse extends mostly to the US, the underpinning rationale can be extrapolated to any other capital-concentrated areas.</description></item></channel></rss>